MBE Rules · Community Property

General CP Presumption

Cal. Fam. Code § 760

The rule

All property acquired by a married person during marriage while domiciled in California is presumptively community property. The presumption is rebuttable only by clear evidence tracing the property to a separate source or by a valid transmutation, agreement, or statutory exception.

In plain English

In California, any property that a married person acquires during the marriage is generally considered community property, meaning it belongs to both spouses. This presumption can be challenged if there is clear evidence showing that the property came from a separate source or if there was a valid agreement or change in ownership.

Worked example

During their marriage, Jane buys a car using her personal savings from before the marriage. When they divorce, Jane claims the car is her separate property. However, she must provide clear evidence tracing the funds to her separate source to rebut the community property presumption. If she fails to do so, the car will be considered community property.

Memory hook

What’s mine is ours—unless I can prove otherwise!

The trap

Exams often present scenarios where students must identify whether property is community or separate, leading them to overlook the need for clear evidence to rebut the presumption.

How examiners test it

Questions typically involve fact patterns about property acquired during marriage, requiring candidates to analyze whether the presumption of community property can be rebutted.

Drill this rule until it can't fail you.

Vrenberg generates unlimited questions on this exact rule, tracks your mastery of it, and brings it back until it sticks.