MBE Rules · Community Property

Tort Liability of Spouses

Cal. Fam. Code § 1000

The rule

A tort judgment against one spouse is satisfied first from separate property when the act was not for community benefit (first from community when it was); the injured spouse's recovery against the other is separate property.

In plain English

In community property states, if one spouse commits a tort that benefits the community, any judgment against that spouse is paid from community property. If the act was not for the community's benefit, the judgment is paid from the tortfeasor's separate property, and any recovery by the injured spouse is considered separate property as well.

Worked example

Hannah and Jake are married, and Jake accidentally damages a neighbor's property while driving home from work. Since the act was for community benefit, the neighbor's judgment against Jake is paid from their community property. However, if Jake had caused the damage while joyriding, the judgment would be paid from Jake's separate property.

Memory hook

Torts for the community, pay from the community; otherwise, it's separate!

The trap

Exams may present scenarios where it's unclear whether the tort was for community benefit, leading students to misapply the property rules. Watch for details that clarify the purpose of the act.

How examiners test it

Questions often involve fact patterns where one spouse commits a tort, requiring candidates to determine the source of payment and the nature of the recovery for the injured spouse.

Drill this rule until it can't fail you.

Vrenberg generates unlimited questions on this exact rule, tracks your mastery of it, and brings it back until it sticks.