MBE Rules · Professional Responsibility

Compensation from Third Parties

Cal. Rule 1.8.6

The rule

Accepting payment from someone other than the client (insurer, employer, family) requires no interference with independent judgment, protection of confidentiality, and the client's informed written consent.

In plain English

A lawyer can accept payment from a third party, such as an insurer or family member, as long as it does not compromise their ability to make independent decisions for the client. The lawyer must also ensure that client confidentiality is maintained and obtain the client's informed written consent before accepting the payment.

Worked example

Attorney Smith represents Client Jones in a personal injury case. Jones's family member offers to pay Smith's fees, but Smith explains the need for Jones's consent and ensures that the payment does not affect his judgment. After discussing it with Jones, who agrees and provides written consent, Smith accepts the payment. The outcome is that Smith can ethically accept the payment while maintaining his duty to Jones.

Memory hook

Third-party payments need client consent and must not cloud judgment.

The trap

Exams may present scenarios where the lawyer's independence is subtly compromised, leading students to overlook the need for informed consent.

How examiners test it

Questions often involve fact patterns where third-party payments are offered, testing whether the lawyer has taken the necessary steps to protect the client's interests.

Drill this rule until it can't fail you.

Vrenberg generates unlimited questions on this exact rule, tracks your mastery of it, and brings it back until it sticks.