MBE Rules · Professional Responsibility
Compensation from Third Parties
Cal. Rule 1.8.6
The rule
Accepting payment from someone other than the client (insurer, employer, family) requires no interference with independent judgment, protection of confidentiality, and the client's informed written consent.
In plain English
A lawyer can accept payment from a third party, such as an insurer or family member, as long as it does not compromise their ability to make independent decisions for the client. The lawyer must also ensure that client confidentiality is maintained and obtain the client's informed written consent before accepting the payment.
Worked example
Attorney Smith represents Client Jones in a personal injury case. Jones's family member offers to pay Smith's fees, but Smith explains the need for Jones's consent and ensures that the payment does not affect his judgment. After discussing it with Jones, who agrees and provides written consent, Smith accepts the payment. The outcome is that Smith can ethically accept the payment while maintaining his duty to Jones.
Memory hook
Third-party payments need client consent and must not cloud judgment.
The trap
Exams may present scenarios where the lawyer's independence is subtly compromised, leading students to overlook the need for informed consent.
How examiners test it
Questions often involve fact patterns where third-party payments are offered, testing whether the lawyer has taken the necessary steps to protect the client's interests.
Drill this rule until it can't fail you.
Vrenberg generates unlimited questions on this exact rule, tracks your mastery of it, and brings it back until it sticks.
More Professional Responsibility rules
- Duty of Confidentiality · Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 6068(e); Rule 1.6
- Client Trust Account — IOLTA · Cal. Rules of Prof. Conduct 1.15
- Duty to Report Misconduct · Cal. Rules of Prof. Conduct 8.3
- Unconscionable Fees · Cal. Rule 1.5
- Fee Division Among Lawyers · Cal. Rule 1.5.1
- Threatening Prosecution · Cal. Rule 3.10