MBE Rules · Remedies
Rescission
Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1689-1693
The rule
A party may rescind a contract on grounds of fraud, mistake, duress, undue influence, failure of consideration, illegality, or where a party's consent was not free. Rescission is accompanied by restoration of consideration received. Delay in seeking rescission may be a bar under laches.
In plain English
Rescission is a legal remedy that allows a party to cancel a contract and return to their original position if they were misled or coerced into the agreement. This can happen due to reasons like fraud, mistake, or undue influence, and the party seeking rescission must also return any benefits received under the contract.
Worked example
Alice entered into a contract to buy a car from Bob, believing it was in excellent condition. After discovering that Bob had hidden significant damage, Alice sought rescission of the contract. The court granted her request, allowing her to return the car and recover her payment.
Memory hook
Rescission: Cancel the contract, restore the deal!
The trap
Exams often include fact patterns where students must distinguish between rescission and other remedies like damages, leading to confusion about the appropriate remedy for the situation. Watch for subtle hints about consent issues that might suggest rescission is appropriate.
How examiners test it
Questions typically present scenarios involving misrepresentation or coercion, requiring candidates to identify whether rescission is the correct remedy and to discuss the implications of restoring consideration.
Drill this rule until it can't fail you.
Vrenberg generates unlimited questions on this exact rule, tracks your mastery of it, and brings it back until it sticks.