MBE Rules · Professional Responsibility

Imputed Conflicts and Screening

Cal. Rule 1.10

The rule

One lawyer's conflict is imputed firm-wide, but a lateral's former-client conflict does not disqualify the firm if the lawyer is timely screened, shares no fee from the matter, and written notice goes to the former client.

In plain English

When one lawyer in a firm has a conflict of interest, that conflict generally applies to the entire firm. However, if a lawyer joins the firm and has a conflict from a former client, the firm can avoid disqualification by implementing timely screening measures, ensuring the lawyer does not share in any fees from the matter, and notifying the former client in writing.

Worked example

Attorney A works at Firm X and has a conflict due to a former client. Attorney B joins Firm X from another firm, bringing a similar conflict. Firm X promptly screens Attorney B, ensures they do not receive any fees from the case, and sends written notice to the former client. As a result, Firm X is not disqualified from representing the new client.

Memory hook

Screening saves the firm from a lateral's past conflicts!

The trap

Exams may present scenarios where students overlook the importance of timely screening or fail to recognize that the lateral's conflict can be managed without disqualifying the entire firm.

How examiners test it

Questions often involve fact patterns where a new lawyer brings a conflict, testing the candidate's understanding of screening procedures and the requirements for avoiding firm-wide disqualification.

Drill this rule until it can't fail you.

Vrenberg generates unlimited questions on this exact rule, tracks your mastery of it, and brings it back until it sticks.