MBE Rules · Professional Responsibility

Organization as Client

Cal. Rule 1.13

The rule

The lawyer represents the entity, not constituents; on learning of a constituent's violation likely to cause substantial injury, the lawyer must proceed in the entity's best interest — escalating internally — but California does not permit outside disclosure beyond Rule 1.6/§ 6068(e).

In plain English

When a lawyer represents an organization, their client is the entity itself, not the individuals within it. If the lawyer discovers that someone within the organization is likely to cause significant harm, they must act in the organization's best interest, typically by reporting the issue internally, but they cannot disclose this information outside the organization except as allowed by specific rules.

Worked example

A corporate attorney learns that the CFO is embezzling funds, which could lead to substantial financial harm to the company. The attorney must first report this internally to the board of directors to address the issue. However, the attorney cannot disclose the CFO's actions to law enforcement without the organization's consent. The outcome is that the attorney successfully escalates the issue internally, protecting the organization while adhering to the rules.

Memory hook

The entity is the client, not the individuals; protect the organization first!

The trap

Exams may present scenarios where students confuse their obligations to the organization with those to individual constituents, leading to incorrect conclusions about disclosure. Students might also overlook the limitations on outside reporting.

How examiners test it

Questions often involve a situation where a lawyer discovers wrongdoing within an organization, testing the candidate's understanding of the duty to report internally versus the restrictions on external disclosure.

Drill this rule until it can't fail you.

Vrenberg generates unlimited questions on this exact rule, tracks your mastery of it, and brings it back until it sticks.