MBE Rules · Wills, Trusts & Estates

Presumptively Disqualified Donees

Cal. Prob. Code § 21380

The rule

Donative transfers to the drafter, care custodians (for transfers within specified windows), and their relatives or cohabitants are presumed the product of fraud or undue influence — rebuttable only by clear and convincing evidence, and cured by an independent-attorney certificate of review.

In plain English

When someone drafts a will or trust, any gifts they make to themselves, their caregivers, or close relatives are presumed to be influenced by fraud or undue influence. This presumption can be challenged only with strong evidence and can be overcome if an independent attorney reviews the situation and certifies that the transfer was fair.

Worked example

A lawyer drafts a will that leaves a significant inheritance to her sister, who is also her cohabitant. After the lawyer's death, the will is contested on the grounds of undue influence. The court finds that the lawyer did not provide clear and convincing evidence to rebut the presumption, and the will is deemed invalid.

Memory hook

Gifts to the drafter or their close ones raise red flags for undue influence!

The trap

Exams may present scenarios where the donee claims the transfer was voluntary, but students often overlook the presumption of undue influence that applies to these relationships.

How examiners test it

Questions typically involve a fact pattern where a drafter leaves assets to themselves or their relatives, prompting students to identify the presumption of disqualification and the burden of proof required to rebut it.

Drill this rule until it can't fail you.

Vrenberg generates unlimited questions on this exact rule, tracks your mastery of it, and brings it back until it sticks.