MBE Rules · Wills, Trusts & Estates

Powers of Appointment

General vs. special powers

The rule

A general power is exercisable in favor of the donee, her estate, or creditors; a special power is limited to a defined class; appointive property under an unexercised special power passes to takers in default or, if none, back to the donor's estate.

In plain English

A power of appointment allows a person (the donee) to decide who will receive certain property. A general power lets the donee give the property to themselves, their estate, or their creditors, while a special power restricts the donee to appointing the property to a specific group of people. If the donee does not exercise a special power, the property goes to those designated as takers in default or back to the original donor's estate.

Worked example

Jane has a special power of appointment over a trust that allows her to distribute the assets only to her children. If Jane chooses not to exercise this power, the assets will go to her children as takers in default. However, if she had a general power, she could have also appointed the assets to herself or her creditors. In this case, the outcome is that the assets go to her children.

Memory hook

General powers are broad; special powers are narrow – know who gets what!

The trap

Exams often confuse students by mixing up general and special powers, leading them to misidentify the beneficiaries or the outcome of unexercised powers. Watch for language that suggests limitations on the donee's choices.

How examiners test it

Questions typically present a scenario where a donee has a power of appointment and ask about the distribution of property if the power is exercised or not. Look for details about the type of power to determine the correct beneficiaries.

Drill this rule until it can't fail you.

Vrenberg generates unlimited questions on this exact rule, tracks your mastery of it, and brings it back until it sticks.