MBE Rules · Wills, Trusts & Estates

Secret and Semi-Secret Trusts

Secret and semi-secret trusts

The rule

A gift absolute on its face made in reliance on the devisee's promise to hold for another is enforced by constructive trust; where the will shows trust intent but no beneficiary (semi-secret), the gift results back to the estate in the traditional view.

In plain English

Secret trusts occur when a will leaves a gift to a beneficiary who has promised to use it for another person's benefit, allowing the court to enforce this promise through a constructive trust. Semi-secret trusts arise when a will indicates a trust exists but does not name a beneficiary, typically resulting in the gift reverting to the estate instead of being enforced.

Worked example

A testator leaves $10,000 to their friend, with the understanding that the friend will use it to benefit the testator's child, although the will does not mention the child. Upon the testator's death, the court imposes a constructive trust on the $10,000, requiring the friend to use it for the child's benefit. In contrast, if the will simply states that the friend is to hold the money in trust without naming a beneficiary, the $10,000 would revert to the estate.

Memory hook

Trusts in disguise: secret trusts enforce promises, while semi-secret trusts leave gifts hanging!

The trap

Exams may present fact patterns where the intent of the testator is ambiguous, leading students to misidentify whether a trust is secret or semi-secret. Students often overlook the implications of naming a beneficiary or the lack thereof.

How examiners test it

Questions typically involve a will with ambiguous language regarding a trust, testing the candidate's ability to distinguish between secret and semi-secret trusts and their respective outcomes.

Drill this rule until it can't fail you.

Vrenberg generates unlimited questions on this exact rule, tracks your mastery of it, and brings it back until it sticks.