MBE Rules · Civil Procedure
Forum Non Conveniens
Piper Aircraft v. Reyno
The rule
A court may dismiss for an adequate, far more convenient foreign forum after balancing private and public interest factors; a less favorable substantive law in the alternative forum does not defeat dismissal.
In plain English
Forum Non Conveniens allows a court to dismiss a case when there is a more appropriate forum available to hear the case, even if that forum is in another country. The court will weigh both private interests, like the convenience for the parties and witnesses, and public interests, such as the burden on the court system and local interest in the case.
Worked example
A U.S. company sues a foreign manufacturer in a U.S. court for breach of contract. The manufacturer argues that the case should be dismissed because the contract was signed in the manufacturer's home country, where the evidence and witnesses are located. The court agrees, finding that the foreign forum is more convenient and dismisses the case.
Memory hook
Dismiss for convenience, even if the law isn't as favorable.
The trap
Exams may present scenarios where students focus too heavily on the substantive law of the alternative forum, forgetting that it does not prevent dismissal under Forum Non Conveniens.
How examiners test it
Questions often involve a fact pattern where multiple jurisdictions are presented, requiring students to analyze the convenience factors and decide if dismissal is appropriate.
Drill this rule until it can't fail you.
Vrenberg generates unlimited questions on this exact rule, tracks your mastery of it, and brings it back until it sticks.