MBE Rules · Real Property
Deed Descriptions
Deed descriptions and reformation
The rule
A deed needs a description sufficient to identify the land; patent ambiguities may void the conveyance while latent ambiguities admit extrinsic evidence, and courts reform mistaken descriptions between the original parties.
In plain English
A deed must clearly describe the property being transferred so that it can be identified without confusion. If the description has obvious errors, it can invalidate the deed, while less obvious errors allow for outside evidence to clarify the intent of the parties involved.
Worked example
Alice sells a parcel of land to Bob, but the deed describes the property as 'the land next to the old oak tree.' If the oak tree is no longer there, this description could be considered a patent ambiguity, potentially voiding the conveyance. However, if the deed had described the property as 'the land at 123 Main St., adjacent to the old oak tree,' and the oak tree is gone, extrinsic evidence could be used to determine the intended property.
Memory hook
Clear descriptions keep deeds alive; vague ones can kill them.
The trap
Exams often present fact patterns with ambiguous property descriptions, leading students to misinterpret whether the ambiguity is patent or latent. Students may overlook the importance of identifying the type of ambiguity and its implications for the deed's validity.
How examiners test it
Questions typically involve a scenario where a deed's description is challenged, requiring candidates to analyze whether the ambiguity is patent or latent and what evidence may be admissible.
Drill this rule until it can't fail you.
Vrenberg generates unlimited questions on this exact rule, tracks your mastery of it, and brings it back until it sticks.