MBE Rules · Civil Procedure
Costs of Refiled Actions
FRCP 41(d)
The rule
A plaintiff who dismissed and refiles the same claim may be ordered to pay the earlier action's costs and comply before proceeding.
In plain English
If a plaintiff voluntarily dismisses a lawsuit and then decides to refile the same claim, the court can require the plaintiff to pay the costs incurred by the defendant in the first action before the plaintiff can proceed with the new case. This rule is meant to prevent abuse of the legal process and ensure that defendants are not unfairly burdened by repeated litigation over the same issue.
Worked example
A plaintiff initially files a lawsuit against a defendant for breach of contract but later voluntarily dismisses the case. After reconsidering, the plaintiff decides to refile the same breach of contract claim. The court orders the plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs from the first action before allowing the new case to proceed.
Memory hook
Dismiss and refile? Pay the costs before you try!
The trap
Exams may include scenarios where a plaintiff dismisses a case without understanding the cost implications, leading students to overlook the requirement to pay before refiling. Be cautious of fact patterns that suggest a quick dismissal without considering prior costs.
How examiners test it
This rule often appears in questions that involve a plaintiff's strategic dismissal and re-filing of claims, testing the candidate's knowledge of procedural costs and the implications of voluntary dismissals.
Drill this rule until it can't fail you.
Vrenberg generates unlimited questions on this exact rule, tracks your mastery of it, and brings it back until it sticks.