MBE Rules · Criminal Procedure
Juvenile Miranda Custody
J.D.B. v. North Carolina
The rule
A child's age informs the objective Miranda custody analysis when known or apparent to the officer — a reasonable-child standard applies to school questioning.
In plain English
When determining if a juvenile is in custody for Miranda purposes, their age is an important factor. Officers must consider how a reasonable child of that age would perceive the situation, especially in a school setting.
Worked example
A 14-year-old student is pulled out of class by a police officer and taken to a separate room for questioning about a theft. The officer does not inform the student of his rights, believing he is not in custody. Given the student's age and the circumstances, the court finds that the student was in custody and should have received a Miranda warning.
Memory hook
In juvenile cases, think like a reasonable kid, not just an adult.
The trap
Exams may present scenarios where the officer believes the child is not in custody, but students might overlook the child's age and the reasonable-child standard. This can lead to incorrect conclusions about whether Miranda warnings were necessary.
How examiners test it
Questions often involve fact patterns with juveniles being questioned in school settings, prompting candidates to analyze the custody determination based on the child's age and the circumstances.
Drill this rule until it can't fail you.
Vrenberg generates unlimited questions on this exact rule, tracks your mastery of it, and brings it back until it sticks.